If you're involved in a crash with a driver who has no insurance — or not enough — Illinois law requires your own auto insurance policy to include a specific type of protection. Understanding how that requirement works, and what it covers, helps clarify what happens when the at-fault driver simply can't pay.
Under 215 ILCS 5/143a, Illinois insurers are required to offer uninsured motorist (UM) coverage on every private passenger auto policy issued in the state. This isn't optional — it must be included unless the insured specifically rejects it in writing.
The minimum required UM coverage mirrors Illinois's mandatory liability minimums: $25,000 per person / $50,000 per accident for bodily injury. Drivers can purchase higher limits, and many do.
Illinois also requires insurers to offer underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage — though acceptance of UIM is not mandatory in the same way. UIM applies when the at-fault driver has insurance, but their policy limits aren't enough to cover your damages.
These two coverages — UM and UIM — are related but distinct, and the statute treats them differently in certain situations.
UM coverage pays your damages when the at-fault driver has no liability insurance at all. It steps into the shoes of that missing coverage and compensates you for losses you would otherwise pursue directly from the other driver.
In Illinois, UM coverage generally applies to:
It does not typically cover property damage under the UM statute, though some policies may include separate uninsured motorist property damage (UMPD) provisions depending on the insurer and policy language.
A UM claim is a first-party claim — meaning you're filing against your own insurer, not the other driver's. That changes the dynamic considerably.
| Feature | Third-Party Claim | UM/UIM Claim |
|---|---|---|
| Who you deal with | Other driver's insurer | Your own insurer |
| Fault still matters | Yes | Yes — you must establish the other driver was at fault |
| Dispute resolution | Negotiation / lawsuit | Often arbitration per policy terms |
| Coverage trigger | Other driver's liability policy | Your own UM/UIM coverage |
Even though you're dealing with your own insurer, fault still matters. You must demonstrate that the uninsured driver was legally liable for the crash — Illinois is an at-fault state, meaning negligence drives the outcome.
Illinois follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you're found partially at fault, your recovery is reduced proportionally. If you're more than 50% at fault, you may be barred from recovering entirely — even under your own UM coverage.
One notable feature of Illinois UM claims: many disputes go to binding arbitration rather than civil court, depending on the policy language. Illinois law permits this, and most standard auto policies include an arbitration clause for UM/UIM disagreements.
This means if you and your insurer disagree on the value of your claim — how much your injuries are worth, whether the other driver was truly at fault, or how much your UIM coverage should pay after the other driver's policy is exhausted — the dispute may be resolved through an arbitration process rather than a traditional lawsuit.
That process has its own procedures, timelines, and rules of evidence. It's a meaningful distinction from how third-party claims are handled.
UIM coverage in Illinois kicks in when the at-fault driver's liability limits are lower than your actual damages — and lower than your own UIM limits. It's not a simple top-up. The interaction between the other driver's policy and your UIM policy involves specific offset rules.
For example: if the at-fault driver carries $25,000 in liability coverage and your UIM limit is $100,000, your insurer generally pays the difference — but how that math works depends on your specific policy language and how Illinois courts interpret it.
🔍 Stacking — the practice of combining UM/UIM limits across multiple vehicles or policies — is addressed under Illinois law, but whether your policy permits it depends on how it was written and what you agreed to at purchase.
No two UM claims resolve the same way. Key variables include:
The Illinois statute sets the floor. Your actual policy, your specific injuries, and the facts of the crash determine where your claim lands within that framework.
How those pieces fit together in any individual situation is something only a review of the actual policy — and the specific accident facts — can answer.
