San Antonio sits in Bexar County, and like the rest of Texas, it follows specific rules around fault, insurance, and civil liability that shape how car accident cases unfold. If you've been in a crash here — or are trying to understand what the process looks like — here's how it generally works.
Texas uses an at-fault system, meaning the driver responsible for causing the accident is generally liable for resulting damages. Injured parties typically file claims against the at-fault driver's liability insurance rather than their own — though your own coverage may also come into play depending on the situation.
Texas also follows modified comparative fault, sometimes called proportionate responsibility. Under this framework, a person can recover damages even if they were partially at fault — but their recovery is reduced by their percentage of fault. If someone is found 51% or more at fault, they are generally barred from recovering damages under Texas law.
This matters in San Antonio cases because how fault is assigned — through police reports, witness statements, traffic camera footage, or insurer investigations — can significantly affect what's recoverable.
In a Texas car accident claim, recoverable damages typically fall into two categories:
| Damage Type | What It Covers |
|---|---|
| Economic damages | Medical bills, future medical costs, lost wages, loss of earning capacity, property damage |
| Non-economic damages | Pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life |
| Punitive damages | Rare; generally reserved for cases involving gross negligence or intentional misconduct |
The actual value of any claim depends on injury severity, treatment costs, liability clarity, available insurance coverage, and many other case-specific factors.
After a San Antonio crash, the claims process generally follows this path:
Texas requires drivers to carry minimum liability insurance of $30,000 per person / $60,000 per accident / $25,000 for property damage (commonly written as 30/60/25). These are minimums — many drivers carry more, and some carry less or none at all.
Relevant coverage types in Texas claims include:
Whether any of these apply to a specific claim depends on what coverage was actually purchased and the policy terms.
Personal injury attorneys in Texas typically handle car accident cases on a contingency fee basis — meaning no upfront cost to the client. The attorney's fee is a percentage of the final settlement or judgment, commonly in the range of 33–40%, though this varies by firm and case complexity.
What a personal injury attorney typically does in this context:
Legal representation is commonly sought in cases involving significant injuries, disputed liability, multiple parties, commercial vehicles, or situations where an insurer has denied or undervalued a claim.
Texas generally gives injured parties two years from the date of the accident to file a personal injury lawsuit. Property damage claims follow a similar timeline. Missing this deadline typically forecloses the right to sue, regardless of the strength of the claim.
There are exceptions — for minors, cases involving government entities, or situations where an injury wasn't immediately apparent — and those exceptions have their own rules and shorter notice requirements in some instances.
Treatment records are central to any Texas car accident claim. Insurers review the timing, consistency, and nature of medical care when evaluating damages. Gaps in treatment, delayed care, or treatment that ends abruptly can raise questions during negotiation.
Typical post-accident care may include emergency evaluation, imaging, follow-up with a primary care physician or specialist, physical therapy, and — in more serious cases — surgical consultation or long-term pain management. Diminished value claims for vehicle worth are also recognized in Texas, though they require documentation and are handled separately from bodily injury claims.
No two San Antonio car accident cases are the same. The path forward — and what's ultimately recoverable — turns on the severity of injuries, clarity of fault, available insurance limits on all sides, whether UM/UIM coverage applies, the quality of documentation, and how quickly and consistently medical care was sought.
These are the variables that separate one case from another — and why the general framework above can only take someone so far before the specific facts of their situation determine what actually applies.
