When people search for a firm like Loncar Lyon Jenkins, they're usually in the middle of something stressful — a recent crash, an insurance dispute, mounting medical bills, or uncertainty about what comes next. Understanding how car accident attorneys generally operate, what they do, and how the claims process works helps people approach that situation with clearer expectations.
Personal injury attorneys who handle car accident cases typically work on a contingency fee basis. That means they don't charge upfront hourly fees — instead, they take a percentage of any settlement or court award if the case resolves in the client's favor. If there's no recovery, there's generally no attorney fee. Contingency percentages commonly range from 25% to 40%, depending on the complexity of the case, whether it goes to trial, and the state where the case is filed.
A car accident attorney's role typically includes:
Attorneys who specialize in this area tend to be familiar with how local insurers negotiate, what local courts expect, and how juries in their region have historically responded to similar cases.
Before any compensation can flow, fault typically has to be established. This is done through police reports, physical evidence, witness accounts, and sometimes accident reconstruction.
States handle fault very differently:
| Fault Framework | How It Works |
|---|---|
| At-fault states | The driver responsible for the crash is liable for damages through their liability insurance |
| No-fault states | Each driver's own insurance covers their medical costs up to a limit, regardless of fault (PIP) |
| Pure comparative fault | Damages reduced by your percentage of fault — even at 99% fault, some recovery may exist |
| Modified comparative fault | Recovery reduced by fault percentage, but barred if you're more than 50% or 51% at fault |
| Contributory negligence | A small number of states bar recovery entirely if the injured party was at all at fault |
Which system applies to a given case depends entirely on the state where the accident occurred. That's one of the most significant variables in any car accident claim.
In most at-fault and some hybrid systems, damages in car accident cases generally fall into two categories:
Economic damages — losses with a direct dollar amount:
Non-economic damages — harder to quantify but legally recognized:
Some states cap non-economic damages in certain types of cases. Others don't. The severity of injuries, the strength of medical documentation, and the available insurance coverage all shape what a realistic recovery looks like in any given situation.
Several types of coverage commonly come into play after a crash:
When attorneys evaluate a case, coverage limits matter as much as fault does. A clear-cut liability case can still produce limited recovery if the at-fault driver is underinsured and the injured party doesn't have UM/UIM coverage.
Car accident claims don't resolve on a fixed schedule. Several factors influence how long the process takes:
Insurance companies are often in no particular hurry. Delays are common, and they can work against injured parties who settle too early before the full scope of injuries is known.
Treatment records are the backbone of any injury claim. They establish what injuries occurred, what care was required, and what ongoing impact the crash has had. Gaps in treatment — skipped appointments, delayed care, or inconsistent follow-through — are frequently used by insurance adjusters to argue that injuries were minor or unrelated to the accident.
When an attorney gets involved, they typically help ensure that the medical record accurately reflects the full picture of the client's condition and its connection to the crash.
Two people can be rear-ended at the same intersection and end up with very different outcomes — different settlement amounts, different timelines, different legal options. The variables that drive those differences include:
Understanding the general framework is useful — but how that framework applies to a specific accident, in a specific state, with specific injuries and specific insurance policies in play, is where the analysis has to get much more particular.
