Browse TopicsInsuranceFind an AttorneyAbout UsAbout UsContact Us

What Does the Defense Attorney Do in a Wrongful Death Case?

When a motor vehicle accident results in someone's death, the legal proceedings that follow involve more than just the family pursuing a claim. On the other side of that claim is a defense — and understanding how that defense operates helps explain why wrongful death cases often take the shape they do.

The Defense Attorney's Role in a Wrongful Death Claim

In most wrongful death cases arising from a car accident, the defense attorney is hired and paid by the at-fault driver's insurance company — not by the driver personally. This is a standard part of how liability insurance works: when a covered driver is sued, the insurer has both the right and the obligation to provide that driver with a legal defense.

The defense attorney's job is to represent the interests of the insured defendant — but within limits set by the insurer. Their primary focus is typically to:

  • Challenge whether the defendant was actually at fault, or argue shared fault
  • Contest the nature and extent of the claimed damages
  • Examine whether the death was directly caused by the crash or by other factors
  • Identify procedural or legal issues that could affect the outcome

This is not a passive role. Defense attorneys in wrongful death cases investigate thoroughly, retain their own expert witnesses, depose the plaintiff's witnesses, and build counter-narratives around causation and liability.

How Fault Is Contested in Wrongful Death Cases

One of the most active areas of defense strategy involves fault and causation. Even when a death follows a crash, the defense may argue:

  • The deceased was partially or fully at fault for the collision
  • A pre-existing medical condition — not the crash — was the proximate cause of death
  • The deceased's own conduct (speeding, distraction, failure to wear a seatbelt) contributed to the fatal outcome

How these arguments land depends heavily on the state's fault rules.

Fault RuleHow It WorksEffect on Wrongful Death Recovery
Pure comparative negligenceDamages reduced by the deceased's percentage of faultRecovery possible even if mostly at fault
Modified comparative negligenceRecovery barred if fault exceeds a threshold (often 50% or 51%)Partial fault may eliminate recovery entirely
Contributory negligenceAny fault by the deceased may bar recoveryDefense has strong incentive to establish any shared fault
No-fault statesPIP covers some losses regardless of faultTort claims still subject to fault rules above PIP thresholds

A few states still apply contributory negligence, where even minor fault on the part of the deceased can be used to bar recovery entirely. That's a significant defense tool in those jurisdictions.

What the Defense Examines in a Wrongful Death Case

Defense attorneys don't take claims at face value. In a wrongful death case, they typically investigate:

  • The crash itself — police reports, accident reconstruction, physical evidence, traffic camera footage, and witness accounts
  • The decedent's medical history — to assess whether underlying conditions contributed to the death
  • The claimed damages — economic losses like lost income and benefits, and non-economic losses like loss of companionship, which are often contested
  • Who qualifies as a plaintiff — state law strictly defines who can file a wrongful death claim and in what capacity; the defense may challenge standing

⚖️ The defense may also challenge the valuation methodology used by the plaintiff's experts, particularly for future lost earnings and the non-economic damages that are hardest to quantify.

The Role of the Insurance Company Behind the Defense

It's important to understand that the insurer funding the defense has its own interests, which don't always perfectly align with the defendant's. The insurer wants to:

  • Resolve the case within the policy limits if possible
  • Avoid a verdict that exceeds coverage
  • Control litigation costs

When damages claimed in a wrongful death case are large — and they often are — the gap between policy limits and potential jury verdicts becomes a central tension. If a verdict exceeds the policy limit, the defendant may be personally liable for the excess, which changes the dynamics of settlement negotiations significantly.

This is why wrongful death cases sometimes involve disputes about whether the insurer acted in good faith in handling the defense and settlement negotiations — a separate but related legal concept.

What Damages Are Typically at Issue

Wrongful death claims generally seek to compensate the surviving family members for specific categories of loss. The defense attorney will typically challenge the scope and calculation of each:

  • Economic damages — loss of the decedent's future income, benefits, household services, and medical or funeral costs
  • Non-economic damages — loss of companionship, guidance, and emotional support (called "loss of consortium" or "loss of society" depending on the state)
  • Punitive damages — only available in cases involving gross negligence or intentional conduct; aggressively contested by the defense

🗂️ Some states cap non-economic or punitive damages in wrongful death cases. Others don't. Those caps, where they exist, directly shape what the defense is trying to achieve at trial or in settlement.

Why the Defense's Position Varies So Much by Case

No two wrongful death cases present the same defense profile. The strength and strategy of the defense depends on the available evidence, the jurisdiction's fault rules, the policy limits involved, the clarity of causation, and the composition of damages claimed.

A case where liability is clear-cut and damages are well-documented looks very different from one where fault is shared, causation is medically disputed, or the plaintiff's economic damages are difficult to establish. Those variables — not a single template — determine how the defense proceeds and how the case ultimately resolves.

The specific facts of any individual case, the state where it's filed, and the coverage in play are what determine how each of these factors actually weighs out.