A DWI charge in San Antonio — or anywhere in Texas — sets off a legal process that runs on two separate tracks at once. Understanding how both tracks work, and what variables shape the outcome, helps anyone facing this situation make sense of what's ahead.
When someone is arrested for DWI in Texas, they're not just dealing with criminal court. They're also facing an Administrative License Revocation (ALR) proceeding handled by the Texas Department of Public Safety — completely separate from the criminal case.
These two tracks move on different timelines and involve different processes:
| Track | Who Handles It | What's at Stake |
|---|---|---|
| Criminal case | District or county court | Conviction, fines, probation, jail time |
| ALR proceeding | Texas DPS / SOAH | Driver's license suspension |
A person has 15 days from the date of arrest to request an ALR hearing to contest the license suspension. Missing that window generally means automatic suspension. This is one of the most time-sensitive steps in the entire process.
Texas law defines DWI as operating a motor vehicle in a public place while intoxicated — meaning either a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or higher, or impairment of mental or physical faculties due to alcohol, drugs, or a combination.
First-offense DWI in Texas is generally a Class B misdemeanor, but the charge can escalate based on circumstances:
Each of these distinctions matters significantly when it comes to potential penalties, plea options, and defense strategy.
Defense attorneys handling DWI cases in Bexar County generally work through several phases:
1. Case evaluation and evidence review This includes body and dash camera footage, the arresting officer's report, field sobriety test administration, and the chain of custody for any blood or breath samples. Texas uses both breathalyzer and blood draw evidence, and how those samples were collected and handled can become a central issue in the defense.
2. ALR hearing representation Requesting and appearing at the ALR hearing accomplishes two things: it may delay or prevent license suspension, and it gives the defense an opportunity to question the arresting officer under oath before the criminal trial — a form of early discovery.
3. Motion practice Defense attorneys often file pretrial motions to suppress evidence. Common grounds include whether the initial traffic stop was legally justified, whether field sobriety tests were properly administered, and whether the breath or blood test equipment was properly calibrated and maintained.
4. Plea negotiations Many DWI cases in Texas resolve through negotiated pleas. Prosecutors in Bexar County, like those across Texas, have discretion over what they'll offer. Factors like prior record, BAC level, and case facts all influence what's on the table — or whether anything is.
5. Trial If no acceptable resolution is reached, the case proceeds to trial. DWI defendants in Texas can choose a bench trial (judge decides) or jury trial. Defense at trial typically challenges the reliability of the stop, the accuracy of testing, and officer credibility.
No two DWI cases move through the system identically. Variables that affect what happens include:
Even a first-offense conviction carries real consequences in Texas:
Most DWI defense attorneys charge flat fees rather than hourly rates, though this varies by firm and case complexity. Felony DWI cases typically cost more than misdemeanor cases. Some attorneys charge separately for trial representation versus pretrial work.
Unlike personal injury attorneys, DWI defense attorneys don't work on contingency — there's no settlement at the end. The cost reflects legal work done, not outcomes achieved.
How a DWI case unfolds in San Antonio depends on what happened during the stop, what evidence was collected, what the defendant's history looks like, which court the case lands in, and what the specific facts of the arrest allow or don't allow a defense attorney to work with. General information explains the framework — but it doesn't tell anyone what their specific case will look like, how strong the evidence against them is, or what realistic options exist for their circumstances.
