If you've been hurt in an accident in San Antonio, you may be wondering what a personal injury attorney actually handles, how the legal process works in Texas, and what factors shape the outcome of a claim. This article explains how personal injury law generally operates in Texas — the rules, the timelines, the variables, and where attorney involvement typically fits in.
Texas is an at-fault state, which means the person responsible for causing an accident is generally responsible for covering the resulting damages. Injured parties typically pursue compensation through the at-fault driver's liability insurance, their own insurance (depending on coverage), or civil litigation.
There are two main paths a claim can take:
Texas requires drivers to carry minimum liability coverage, but minimum-limits policies are often inadequate for serious injuries. When the at-fault driver is uninsured or underinsured, UM/UIM coverage on your own policy becomes especially relevant — if you have it.
Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule, sometimes called the 51% bar rule. This means:
For example, if you were found 20% responsible for an accident and your damages total $100,000, you could recover up to $80,000. Fault percentages are determined through insurer investigations, adjuster reviews, police reports, witness statements, and sometimes accident reconstruction.
Personal injury claims in Texas can include both economic and non-economic damages:
| Damage Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Medical expenses | Emergency care, surgery, physical therapy, future treatment |
| Lost wages | Time missed from work during recovery |
| Loss of earning capacity | If injuries limit future ability to work |
| Property damage | Vehicle repair or replacement |
| Pain and suffering | Physical pain, emotional distress |
| Loss of enjoyment of life | Inability to participate in activities as before |
Texas does not cap non-economic damages in most personal injury cases — only in medical malpractice cases. That distinction matters when serious or permanent injuries are involved.
Texas generally gives injured parties two years from the date of an accident to file a personal injury lawsuit. Missing this deadline typically means losing the right to pursue compensation through the courts, regardless of how strong the underlying claim might be.
There are exceptions — involving minors, government entities, delayed injury discovery, and other circumstances — but those exceptions are narrow and fact-specific. Deadlines for claims involving government vehicles or municipal entities can be significantly shorter.
Medical documentation is one of the most important elements of any personal injury claim. Insurers evaluate the nature and extent of injuries based heavily on treatment records — what was diagnosed, what care was received, how consistently treatment was pursued, and what medical providers documented.
Common treatment timelines after a crash include:
Gaps in treatment or delays in seeking care are frequently cited by insurance adjusters when disputing injury severity or causation.
Personal injury attorneys in Texas typically handle cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning they are paid a percentage of the recovery — not an upfront hourly rate. If there's no recovery, there's generally no fee. The percentage varies by firm and case complexity but is commonly discussed before representation begins.
In a personal injury matter, an attorney typically:
Attorneys are often involved when injuries are severe, when fault is disputed, when multiple parties are involved, or when an insurer's initial offer appears inadequate. They also handle subrogation issues — situations where your health insurer seeks reimbursement from a settlement — and medical liens filed by treating providers.
No two injury claims follow the same path. What ultimately shapes the outcome includes:
A rear-end collision with clear liability and limited injuries resolves very differently than a multi-vehicle accident with disputed fault, catastrophic injuries, and insufficient coverage. The same facts can produce dramatically different results depending on how the parties, insurers, and courts respond.
Understanding the general framework is useful. Applying it to a specific accident, injury, and insurance situation is where the details — and the differences — actually live.
