Browse TopicsInsuranceFind an AttorneyAbout UsAbout UsContact Us

What Are General Damages in Personal Injury Claims?

When someone is injured in a car accident, the financial losses don't stop at medical bills. Some of what a person loses — the physical pain, the emotional toll, the disruption to daily life — doesn't come with a receipt. In personal injury claims, these non-economic losses are typically called general damages. Understanding what they are, how they're calculated, and what affects their value is essential to understanding how settlement amounts are built.

General Damages vs. Special Damages: The Core Distinction

Personal injury compensation is usually divided into two broad categories:

  • Special damages (also called economic damages) cover losses with a specific dollar amount: medical expenses, lost wages, property damage, future medical costs, and lost earning capacity.
  • General damages cover losses that are real but harder to quantify: pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of consortium.

The term "general" reflects that these damages don't have a fixed price tag — they require estimation, negotiation, and sometimes a jury's judgment.

What General Damages Typically Include

Type of General DamageWhat It Covers
Pain and sufferingPhysical pain from injuries, both immediate and ongoing
Emotional distressAnxiety, depression, PTSD, and psychological impact of the accident
Loss of enjoyment of lifeInability to participate in hobbies, activities, or daily routines
Loss of consortiumImpact on relationships with a spouse or family members
Disfigurement or permanent scarringLong-term physical changes affecting appearance or function

Not every claim includes all of these. Which categories apply — and how much weight each carries — depends on the nature of the injuries, how they affect the injured person's life, and what can be documented.

How General Damages Are Calculated 💡

There's no universal formula, but two methods are commonly used by insurers and attorneys when estimating general damages:

1. Multiplier Method Special damages (medical bills, lost wages) are added up and multiplied by a number — typically between 1.5 and 5 — based on injury severity. More serious or permanent injuries push the multiplier higher. This is a starting point for negotiation, not a guaranteed outcome.

2. Per Diem Method A daily dollar amount is assigned to the injured person's pain and suffering, then multiplied by the number of days they were affected. This approach is more common when recovery has a clear endpoint.

Insurers use these methods as internal benchmarks. So do plaintiff attorneys. Neither method produces a locked-in number — both are negotiating positions.

What Affects the Value of General Damages

Several factors shape how general damages are ultimately valued in a claim or lawsuit:

  • Injury severity and permanence — Long-term or permanent injuries typically result in higher general damage claims than injuries that resolve quickly
  • Medical documentation — Treatment records, physician notes, imaging results, and mental health evaluations all support general damage claims; gaps in treatment can reduce them
  • Credibility and consistency — A claimant's own statements, medical history, and documented daily impact on their life factor into how insurers and juries assess the claim
  • Jurisdiction — Some states cap general (non-economic) damages, particularly in certain types of cases; others do not
  • Fault rules — In comparative fault states, a claimant's share of responsibility can reduce their total recovery; in contributory negligence states, any fault may bar recovery entirely
  • Whether the case goes to trial — Jury awards for general damages can differ significantly from settlement offers

State Law Has a Major Impact ⚖️

General damages are one of the most jurisdiction-sensitive parts of a personal injury claim.

Tort thresholds in no-fault states — Several states operate under no-fault insurance systems, where injured parties first turn to their own Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage regardless of who caused the accident. In these states, a claimant typically must meet a specific tort threshold — either a dollar amount of medical expenses or a defined injury type (like permanent injury or significant disfigurement) — before they can step outside the no-fault system and pursue general damages from the at-fault driver.

Damage caps — Some states limit the amount recoverable for non-economic damages, particularly in medical malpractice cases. Auto accident claims may or may not be subject to similar caps depending on the state.

Comparative fault reductions — In states that use pure comparative fault, general damages are reduced by the claimant's percentage of fault. In modified comparative fault states, recovery may be barred if the claimant is found to be 50% or 51% or more at fault, depending on the state's rule.

These rules don't just affect whether general damages are available — they affect how much leverage either side has during settlement negotiations.

Why Documentation Matters for General Damages

Because general damages don't come with invoices, building a record of their impact matters. 📋 Treating physicians often document functional limitations and quality-of-life changes in their notes. Mental health records can support emotional distress claims. Personal journals describing day-to-day pain or limitations are sometimes used as supporting evidence. The stronger the documentation trail, the harder it is for an insurer to minimize these losses during negotiation.

The Part That Varies by Situation

How general damages apply to any specific claim depends on factors no general explanation can resolve: the state where the accident happened, whether a no-fault threshold applies, the nature and permanence of the injuries, how fault is allocated, what insurance coverage is in play, and what evidence exists to support the non-economic losses being claimed. Two people with similar injuries in different states — or even different counties — can end up with very different outcomes. The concept is consistent; the application is not.